This article aims to provide an objective and impersonal analysis of the differences between TFS, SVN, and GIT, which are software applications used for version control.

TFS is an ALM solution that offers additional features such as issue tracking, document management, reporting, continuous integration, and virtual labs for testing, while SVN and GIT are primarily source control systems.

TFS is tightly integrated with Visual Studio, whereas SVN has third-party integration options and GIT has improved integration over time.

TFS is a centralized source control system, while GIT is distributed.

TFS incurs upfront costs, whereas SVN is free and TFS2010 is free for Visual Studio users with an MSDN subscription.

Branching and merging are considered easier with TFS compared to SVN and GIT, but GIT offers more convenience, safety, and cost-effectiveness in these processes.

TFS can be challenging to work offline, but TFS 2012 with a distributed source control tool is a viable option.

Overall, the choice between TFS, SVN, and GIT depends on the specific needs and preferences of the users.

Overview and Purpose

TFS, SVN, and GIT are software applications used for version control. TFS serves as an ALM solution, while SVN and GIT are primarily focused on source control.

TFS offers additional features such as issue tracking, document management, reporting, continuous integration, and virtual labs for testing. SVN and GIT, on the other hand, are more streamlined, focusing solely on source control.

TFS is the most tightly integrated with Visual Studio, while SVN has third-party options for integration, and GIT has improved integration over time.

TFS is a paid application, while SVN is free. TFS can be challenging to work offline, but TFS 2012 with a distributed source control tool is worth considering.

Branching and merging is easier with TFS compared to SVN and GIT. However, Git makes branching and merging easier, safer, and cheaper.

Key Features and Functions

SVN and Git are both source control systems that offer a range of key features and functions for version control and collaboration.

SVN, also known as Subversion, is a centralized source control system that focuses on stability and simplicity. It provides features like atomic commits, versioned directories, and easy branching and merging.

Git, on the other hand, is a distributed source control system that emphasizes speed and flexibility. It offers features such as lightweight branching and merging, offline work capabilities, and powerful history tracking. Git also has a strong focus on collaboration, with features like pull requests and code reviews.

Overall, while SVN is known for its stability and simplicity, Git stands out for its speed, flexibility, and robust collaboration features.

Comparison and Pros/Cons

When comparing the key features and functions of TFS, SVN, and Git, it is important to consider the pros and cons of each software application.

TFS offers additional features such as issue tracking, document management, reporting, continuous integration, and virtual labs for testing. It is tightly integrated with Visual Studio but can be challenging to work offline.

SVN is free and has third-party options for integrating with Visual Studio, although not as tightly integrated as TFS.

Git is a distributed source control system that makes branching and merging easier, safer, and cheaper. It requires ramp-up time but is worth the effort. Git also has improved integration with Visual Studio over time.

Overall, TFS is a comprehensive ALM solution, SVN is a cost-effective option, and Git is a powerful and flexible tool for version control.